Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt
From: Anon. (bob.ohara_at_SOD.OFF.Spammers.helsinki.fi)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: John Wilkins: "Re: Analog vs Digital"
- Previous message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Analog vs Digital"
- In reply to: William L Hunt: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Next in thread: William L Hunt: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Reply: William L Hunt: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Reply: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:02:21 +0000 (UTC)
William L Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 05:28:46 +0000 (UTC), "Perplexed in Peoria"
> <jimmenegay@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
<snip>
>
> It seems to me BOH is mostly quibbling here. I have often seen the
> frequency distribution predicted by the Hardy-Weinberg "law" referred
> to as the Hardy-Weinberg distribution and I am sure BOH must have seen
> this also so I don't know why he is complaining about this usage by
> John.
Too much statistics - it simply isn't a distribution in the sense I
would use the term. The only "frequency distribution" (in the sense
that I would use the term) would be the tri-nomial distribution with
cell probabilities {p^2, 2p(1-p), (1-p)^2}.
Bob
-- Bob O'Hara Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics P.O. Box 4 (Yliopistonkatu 5) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki Finland Telephone: +358-9-191 23743 Mobile: +358 50 599 0540 Fax: +358-9-191 22 779 WWW: http://www.RNI.Helsinki.FI/~boh/ Journal of Negative Results - EEB: http://www.jnr-eeb.org
- Next message: John Wilkins: "Re: Analog vs Digital"
- Previous message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Analog vs Digital"
- In reply to: William L Hunt: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Next in thread: William L Hunt: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Reply: William L Hunt: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Reply: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|