Re: Article: How good is our genome?
From: Michael Ragland (ragland37_at_webtv.net)
Date: 07/01/04
- Next message: Ron Okimoto: "Re: Are mutations actually random?"
- Previous message: Anon.: "Re: Hamilton's Rule: light at the end of a LONG tunnel?"
- In reply to: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Article: How good is our genome?"
- Next in thread: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Article: How good is our genome?"
- Reply: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Article: How good is our genome?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:36:49 +0000 (UTC)
Ekurtz
The genome is an entity capable of looking to the future?
Guy:
Interestingly, the answer is yes. That is why natural selection is able
to cause adaptive genomic evolution. The mechanisms of genetics result
in the encoding of the past into the genome, which effectively allows it
to predict the future. If the past, or memories thereof, was too poor at
predicting the future, then heritable changes within populations in
response to natural selection would not result in adaptive evolution. It
would just amplify the noise.
Ragland:
I agree with you but this process of the genome being an entity capable
of looking into the future is in some ways at least quite evolutionarily
slow. Second, although the genome is an entity capable of looking into
its future its not like a crystal ball to us where we can exactly
determine its future.
"It's uncertain whether intelligence has any long term survival value."
Stephen Hawking
- Next message: Ron Okimoto: "Re: Are mutations actually random?"
- Previous message: Anon.: "Re: Hamilton's Rule: light at the end of a LONG tunnel?"
- In reply to: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Article: How good is our genome?"
- Next in thread: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Article: How good is our genome?"
- Reply: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Article: How good is our genome?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|