Re: Evolution In Humans
From: Perplexed in Peoria (jimmenegay_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: William Morse: "Re: Evolution In Humans"
- Previous message: dkomo: "Re: Evolution In Humans"
- In reply to: Strider: "Re: Evolution In Humans"
- Next in thread: Michael Ragland: "Re: Evolution In Humans"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:28:16 +0000 (UTC)
"Strider" <email-address@signature.okay> wrote in message news:ce5t01$21sp$1@darwin.ediacara.org...
> You're saying you think we've made natural selection obsolete in
> ourselves?
Hmmm. The word "obsolete" is usually employed when something that
has a function is advantageously replaced by something else that
fulfills this function better.
So your question suggests that you believe that natural selection
has a function. May I ask what you think that function is? For
whom or what does this function exist?
- Next message: William Morse: "Re: Evolution In Humans"
- Previous message: dkomo: "Re: Evolution In Humans"
- In reply to: Strider: "Re: Evolution In Humans"
- Next in thread: Michael Ragland: "Re: Evolution In Humans"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|