Re: Reviews of Unto Others
From: Perplexed in Peoria (jimmenegay_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 08/01/04
- Next message: John Edser: "A DECLARATION OF MEANING"
- Previous message: John Edser: "Re: Absolute or just relative fitness?"
- In reply to: John Edser: "Re: Reviews of Unto Others"
- Next in thread: John Edser: "Re: Reviews of Unto Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 17:36:27 +0000 (UTC)
"John Edser" <edser@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:cehmdr$310q$1@darwin.ediacara.org...
> ... you have _agreed_ that:
> ____________________________________________
> "no difference between a reduced positive
> c and a negative c exists within Hamilton's
> rule."
> ____________________________________________
Strike three.
- Next message: John Edser: "A DECLARATION OF MEANING"
- Previous message: John Edser: "Re: Absolute or just relative fitness?"
- In reply to: John Edser: "Re: Reviews of Unto Others"
- Next in thread: John Edser: "Re: Reviews of Unto Others"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]