Re: Reviews of Unto Others

From: John Edser (edser_at_tpg.com.au)
Date: 08/02/04 

Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:00:46 +0000 (UTC)

> > JE:-
> > ... you have _agreed_ that:
> > ____________________________________________
> > "no difference between a reduced positive
> > c and a negative c exists within Hamilton's
> > rule."
> > ____________________________________________

> JM:-
> Strike three.

JE:-
--------------quote----------------------

1) 22/01/2004:

JE:-
What is the difference between
a reduced positive c and a negative c?
If c was an abolute measure of fitness
then yes, a real difference exists. However
c is only a relative fitness cost and not
an absolute fitness cost, so what is the
difference?

BOH:-

As far as the rule is concerned, none.

----------- end quote --------------------

My honest understanding was that you agreed
with BOH above. If this understanding
was incorrect please explicitly and
unambiguously state here and now if
you agree or disagree with the answer
BOH provided.

Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

PO Box 266
Church Pt
NSW 2105
Australia

edser@tpg.com.au