Re: Characterizing complexity
From: Michael Ragland (ragland37_at_webtv.net)
Date: 08/11/04
- Next message: Tim Tyler: "Re: what is life"
- Previous message: TomHendricks474: "Re: Basics"
- In reply to: Michael Ragland: "Re: Characterizing complexity"
- Next in thread: dkomo: "Re: Characterizing complexity"
- Reply: dkomo: "Re: Characterizing complexity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:53:07 +0000 (UTC)
MR:
I don't think Homo Sapiens are like sharks which have apparently adapted
so well to their environment that *any* phenotypical change would
decrease its fitness.
On a hunch sharks weren't living fossils I researched the subject and
there have been phenotypic changes as a result of the environment.
However, considering sharks have been around for 400 million years and
predate the dinosaurs I'm not sure how much of a case can be made they
are highly "evolved". I would point to http://www.dinofish.com for an
example of apparently largely evolutionary stasis.
Michael Ragland
"It's uncertain whether intelligence has any long term survival value."
Stephen Hawking
- Next message: Tim Tyler: "Re: what is life"
- Previous message: TomHendricks474: "Re: Basics"
- In reply to: Michael Ragland: "Re: Characterizing complexity"
- Next in thread: dkomo: "Re: Characterizing complexity"
- Reply: dkomo: "Re: Characterizing complexity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]