Re: A Theory of Everything wouldn't solve all the problems of biology
From: firstjois (firstjoisyike_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Dawkins gives incorrect answer"
- Previous message: Henkka: "Squid brains & color changes"
- Next in thread: P: "Re: A Theory of Everything wouldn't solve all the problems of biology"
- Maybe reply: P: "Re: A Theory of Everything wouldn't solve all the problems of biology"
- Reply: Michael Ragland: "Re: A Theory of Everything wouldn't solve all the problems of"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:34:39 +0000 (UTC)
Michael Ragland wrote:
>> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/everything.html
>>
>> "It's uncertain whether intelligence has any long term survival
>> value. Bacteria do quite well without it."
>> Stephen Hawking
My theory has already taken care of absolutely everything:
-- ---------------------------------- "Once you know, you know" The Unified Field of Know Theory Jois
- Next message: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Dawkins gives incorrect answer"
- Previous message: Henkka: "Squid brains & color changes"
- Next in thread: P: "Re: A Theory of Everything wouldn't solve all the problems of biology"
- Maybe reply: P: "Re: A Theory of Everything wouldn't solve all the problems of biology"
- Reply: Michael Ragland: "Re: A Theory of Everything wouldn't solve all the problems of"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|