Re: Hamilton's Rule Reviewed

From: P (fell_trapforspambot_in_at_ozemail.com.au)
Date: 08/31/04 

Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:53:49 +0000 (UTC)

Better to spend mental energy on describing what happens and happened in
actual reality (present and past) than to be bothered racking one's brain
with some tenaciously perceived deficiency of the mathematical artificiality
in Hamilton's rule.

If a latent genetic or epigenetic code for a suicidally self-sacrificing
trait (that require a certain set of circumstances to trigger its behavioral
manifestation) has come to exist within more than one individual of a
population that particular genophenotype has as a fair chance of being
selected for.

No flimsy esoteric logic (not even an Edserian example of such) *should* be
allowed to obscure this simple fact of reality.

But never mind, it is only me - skeptical author of EPT - wishing in vain,
again!

P 

--
Partly inspired by MAD (cold war shaming acronym), I arrived at EPT
[e.g: eclectically Explanatory perversely Pert
philosophical Terminology] and by concEPTual lenses/tools saw/grasped how
and why AEVASIVE preoccupations (personalites) normally preclude making
in-dEPTh sense (of themselves).
In the acronym for Ambiadvantageously Evolved Vexed Actention
Selection (System) Involving Various Endorphins, AS(S) stand for how we
think/emote/behave based on our individual repertoire of competing {by
mutual inhibition) whilst cheered and booed {by current and past
environmental influences) "actention modules", & AE refer to the didactic
division of the Evolutionary Pressure Totality into relevant dialectic
lifetime juxtapositions of:
1. Opportunity
2. Adversity - here especially SHITS [Synaptic Hibernation Imploring
{naturally selective AND 'motivating' of selective unconsciousness)
Traumatic {also tardily so) Situations] normally repercussively retained as
CURSES type memory (aka "Pain", à la Janov)