Patterns of evolution in intellegince
From: melvin (sshrp_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/17/04
- Next message: John Morrison: "Re: Project Genesis"
- Previous message: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Dawkins gives incorrect answer"
- Next in thread: Malcolm: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Reply: Malcolm: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Reply: Peter F: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Reply: Tim Tyler: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Maybe reply: John Edser: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Reply: William Morse: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 05:59:56 +0000 (UTC)
I have encountered a very interesting problem where a complete paper
was written
on methods of approach to this problem.
The problem is, in a game show, every round a contestant is shown 3
unopened doors, two have a goat and one has a car. The contestant then
chooses a door that remains unopened and the host always opens one of
the other two doors which always reveals goat. Should the contestant
switch? The answer is yes with a success of 2/3 if the contestant
always switches. Most people think the chances are 50/50 and it makes
no difference and the problem leads to many heated debates. Many
people never become convinced of the correctness of
the solution and for many it remains counterintuative
Some psychologists have studied in detail what leads people to the
right or wrong conclusion and it would be interesting if one could do
a study to tie in evolutionary pressures in intelligence to shed light
on why the approaches to this problem are so divergent or if certain
types of thinking though wrong still have an evolutionary benifit
which outweighs the negative effects of incorrect reasoning.
- Next message: John Morrison: "Re: Project Genesis"
- Previous message: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Dawkins gives incorrect answer"
- Next in thread: Malcolm: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Reply: Malcolm: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Reply: Peter F: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Reply: Tim Tyler: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Maybe reply: John Edser: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Reply: William Morse: "Re: Patterns of evolution in intellegince"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|