Re: Challenges for Evolutionary Ethics
From: Elie Gendloff (gendloff_at_optonline.net)
Date: 10/04/04
- Next message: Erwin Moller: "Re: Direction of Evolution?"
- Previous message: Michael Ragland: "Re: The uncertainty of evolution"
- In reply to: Michael Ragland: "Challenges for Evolutionary Ethics"
- Next in thread: John Edser: "Re: Challenges for Evolutionary Ethics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
Thats exactly my point. Sickle cell continues where malaria is
present because it is the same trait, even though sickle cell is
disadvantageous evolutionarily, because malaria resistance is more
advantageous than sickle cell is disadvantageous.
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 22:16:00 +0000 (UTC), "Reason" <Landrew@iaf.net>
wrote:
>
>"Elie Gendloff" <gendloff@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:cjntlg$1mbn$1@darwin.ediacara.org...
>> Could altuism be not necessarily advantageous, but is "carried along"
>> or inseperable from another trait, such as the ability to plan ahead,
>> or something else? To use a loose analogy, the sickle cell trait is
>> inseperable from malaria resistance, so it continues.
>
>Sickle-cell anemia IS the malaria resistence trait.
>
- Next message: Erwin Moller: "Re: Direction of Evolution?"
- Previous message: Michael Ragland: "Re: The uncertainty of evolution"
- In reply to: Michael Ragland: "Challenges for Evolutionary Ethics"
- Next in thread: John Edser: "Re: Challenges for Evolutionary Ethics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]