Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe
From: Maurice Barnhill (mvb_at_udel.edu)
Date: 10/25/04
- Next message: Anthony Campbell: "Re: a puzzling aspect of human evolution"
- Previous message: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- In reply to: Michael Ragland: "Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Next in thread: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Reply: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:53:17 +0000 (UTC)
Michael Ragland wrote:
> P.S. I thought I was alone in my belief intelligent life could modify
> the physical laws of the universe for its own purposes. Many may
> strongly disagree with Freeman Dyson but I don't think anybody would
> justifiably consider him a crackpot.
>
>
>
I don't understand this comment. Maybe I missed something
skimming through Dyson's article, but at the beginning he says
"Two assumptions underlie the discussion. (1) The laws of physics
do not change with time. (2) The relevant laws of physics are
already known to us." To me, that seems inconsistent with life
modifying the laws.
-- Maurice Barnhill mvb@udel.edu [Use ReplyTo, not From] [bellatlantic.net is reserved for spam only] Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716
- Next message: Anthony Campbell: "Re: a puzzling aspect of human evolution"
- Previous message: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- In reply to: Michael Ragland: "Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Next in thread: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Reply: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|