Re: Can evolution go backwards?
From: Tim Tyler (tim_at_tt1lock.org)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: TomHendricks474: "Re: No Grace Period for Metabolism Either"
- Previous message: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Article: Duck-billed platypus boasts ten sex chromosomes"
- In reply to: Reason: "Re: Can evolution go backwards?"
- Next in thread: William Morse: "Re: Can evolution go backwards?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
Reason <Landrew@iaf.net> wrote or quoted:
> Since there is no "forwards" in evolutionary terms, it's a difficult
> question to answer. If you mean "forwards" to mean more complexity, then it
> is generally evident in the fossil record that such steps do occur. If an
> organism becomes more survivable with less complexity, it may in fact be a
> step forward. It depends only on whether a simpler organism is more likely
> to survive and reproduce, nothing more. "Direction" is a human attribution
> to a directionless process.
Evolution directionless?
That's a pretty ridiculous idea :-|
It takes a *very* odd perspective to view life as "directionless".
Life is about as directional as an explosion - i.e. it's a *highly*
directional process - and it doesn't take much more than a casual
glance at the history of life on the planet to see that.
-- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@tt1lock.org Remove lock to reply.
- Next message: TomHendricks474: "Re: No Grace Period for Metabolism Either"
- Previous message: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Article: Duck-billed platypus boasts ten sex chromosomes"
- In reply to: Reason: "Re: Can evolution go backwards?"
- Next in thread: William Morse: "Re: Can evolution go backwards?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]