Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe
From: Earle Jones (earle.jones_at_comcast.net)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: TomHendricks474: "Re: No Grace Period for Metabolism Either"
- Previous message: TomHendricks474: "Re: No Grace Period for Metabolism Either"
- In reply to: Michael Ragland: "Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Next in thread: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Reply: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
In article <clh819$j6l$1@darwin.ediacara.org>,
ragland66@webtv.net (Michael Ragland) wrote:
> P.S. I thought I was alone in my belief intelligent life could modify
> the physical laws of the universe for its own purposes. Many may
> strongly disagree with Freeman Dyson but I don't think anybody would
> justifiably consider him a crackpot.
*
Nowhere in Dyson's long piece do I find anything about intelligent
life changing the physical laws of the universe. In fact the whole
bit is prefaced on the fact that the laws are constant.
earle
*
--
__
__/\_\
/\_\/_/
\/_/\_\ earle
\/_/ jones
- Next message: TomHendricks474: "Re: No Grace Period for Metabolism Either"
- Previous message: TomHendricks474: "Re: No Grace Period for Metabolism Either"
- In reply to: Michael Ragland: "Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Next in thread: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Reply: Michael Ragland: "Re: Time without end: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
