Re: Mosquitoes could mutate beyond pesticides' reach
From: Anon. (bob.ohara_at_NOSPAM.helsinki.fi)
Date: 11/10/04
- Next message: Tim Tyler: "Publishing scientific information"
- Previous message: Michael Ragland: "Re: Global warming is real and man made."
- In reply to: Carlos Trevino: "Mosquitoes could mutate beyond pesticides' reach"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:17:06 +0000 (UTC)
Carlos Trevino wrote:
> Nov. 9, 2004, 6:55AM
>
> Mosquitoes could mutate beyond pesticides' reach County predicts most
> potent weapon will be obsolete By ERIC BERGER Copyright 2004 Houston
> Chronicle
>
> Pesticides, long the weapon of choice against the nettlesome and
> sometimes deadly mosquito, are losing their bite.
>
>
> Harris County's chief mosquito fighter has recommended rotating the
> spraying of a handful of still-effective pesticides next year to
> maximize their usefulness. But even with this plan, it's probably a
> matter of when, not if, mosquitoes mutate beyond the control of
> pesticides.
>
My initial reaction to this was to be scpetical, but the explanation for
why this makes sense is below.
> Parsons and others also maintain that some companies, to save money,
> dilute their pesticide, which not only doesn't kill mosquitoes, it
> promotes resistance in the offspring of survivors.
>
This may or may not be true. For a counter-example, from my past life:
O'Hara R.B., Nielsen B.J., Østergård H., 2000. The effect of fungicide
dose on the composition of laboratory populations of barley powdery
mildew. Plant Pathology, 49: 558-566.
At about the same time, Mike Shaw was working on this:
Shaw, M.W. Models of effects of dose heterogeneity and escape on the
selection pressure for pesticide resistance. Phytopathology. 90,
2000,333-339.
From which he concluded that a high dose heterogeneity can reduce the
rate of evolution of resistance. In other words, using old, worn-out
maachinery might be better.
> "Oh, I have no question that this is happening," said Raleigh
> Jenkins, owner of ABC Pest, Pool & Lawn Services, one of the largest
> pesticide companies in Houston. Jenkins said his trucks spray at the
> rate recommended by label pesticide labels.
>
Wow! Bright labels! I wonder what criteria the labels use to get their
recommended rates. Anyone know?
> Weekly spraying common Private spraying is common in Houston. Of the
> more than 100 residential communities that CIA Services manages in
> the greater Houston area, about 20 percent choose to regularly fog
> for mosquitoes, said the company's president, Ralph Troiano.
>
CIA Services!?
<snip>
> Public and private sprayers have two types of pesticides at their
> disposal that can safely be sprayed into residential communities:
> organophosphates, a group of closely related pesticides that includes
> malathion; and a synthetic form of pyrethrins, which are derived
> from chrysanthemum flowers.
>
Organophosphates safe? This must be some new meaning of the word "safe"
that has yet to cross over into British English.
For contrary views, see
<http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5227a1.htm>
<http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/pyrethroids4mosquitos.htm>
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1847580.stm>
So, The Lancet, the BBC, the CDC and the EPA all think that they are not
safe, or at least that they are dangerous in high doses.
> Scientists now believe most mosquitoes may have regained a
> susceptibility to malathion. The reason, they say, is that it is
> difficult for a mosquito to block more than one type of pesticide.
>
> The trick is to try to nurture this susceptibility and breed the
> vulnerability to at least one type of pesticide back into the
> population.
>
> So next year, in Harris County, Parsons said he has recommended that
> the county rotate among spraying with malathion and two different
> types of pyrethrins. This targeted spraying should extend the useful
> lifetimes of the chemicals.
>
> Scientists say an unfortunate byproduct of all spraying is that the
> chemicals will eventually only kill those mosquitoes that have no
> resistance at all. With no reproduction from this desirable group,
> then, it will become increasingly difficult to breed susceptibility
> back into the population.
>
It is always nice to see that evolutionary ideas are being used for
practical purposes: it makes me think that I might be able to do
something useful.
Bob
-- Bob O'Hara Department of Mathematics and Statistics P.O. Box 68 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2b) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki Finland Telephone: +358-9-191 51479 Mobile: +358 50 599 0540 Fax: +358-9-191 51400 WWW: http://www.RNI.Helsinki.FI/~boh/ Journal of Negative Results - EEB: www.jnr-eeb.org
- Next message: Tim Tyler: "Publishing scientific information"
- Previous message: Michael Ragland: "Re: Global warming is real and man made."
- In reply to: Carlos Trevino: "Mosquitoes could mutate beyond pesticides' reach"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]