Re: Music's place in evolution
From: John Wilkins (johnSPAM_at_wilkins.id.au)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: gould"
- Previous message: CNCabej: ""Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- In reply to: Michael Laschober: "Music's place in evolution"
- Next in thread: Tim Tyler: "Re: Music's place in evolution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:38:42 +0000 (UTC)
Michael Laschober <stlpiano@mindspring.com> wrote:
> In what ways can evolution explain the existence of music? There does not
> even seem to be a selective advantage to simple pitch recognition. Is music
> better explained through memetics rather than genetics?
See
http://human-nature.com/nibbs/03/anvil.html
-- John S. Wilkins john@wilkins.id.au web: www.wilkins.id.au blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com God cheats
- Next message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: gould"
- Previous message: CNCabej: ""Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- In reply to: Michael Laschober: "Music's place in evolution"
- Next in thread: Tim Tyler: "Re: Music's place in evolution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
