Re: "Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather...
From: Tim Tyler (tim_at_tt1lock.org)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: Jim McGinn: "Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize"
- Previous message: Jim McGinn: "Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in Hamilton's Model"
- In reply to: CNCabej: ""Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- Next in thread: CNCabej: "Re: "Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- Reply: CNCabej: "Re: "Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:39:02 +0000 (UTC)
CNCabej <cncabej@aol.com> wrote or quoted:
> The role of genes in heredity is becoming probably the most
> controversial issue in modern biology. The majority of leading
> biologists still believe that genes determine the heredity of all the
> living organisms and their evolution is essentially the evolution of
> their genes (now the words genetics and genetical have become
> synonymous to heredity and hereditary!). On the other pole there is
> a growing minority of distinguished biologists that do not endorse that view,
> or even reject it, insisting that genes do not do more than what is
> experimentally known they do: provide information for protein biosynthesis.
AFAICT, this issue depends on the size of the universe.
If the universe is unbounded, then there is no bound on
the quantity of information required to specify one
important thing which an organism inherits from its parents:
its location - and consequently environmental inheritance will
dwarf genetic inheritance.
On the other hand - if the universe is finite, you may well
be able to express the spatio-temporal location of the
organism fairly accurately in many fewer bits than it takes
to specify its genome.
So: the issue of whether genetic or environmental inheritance
transmits more information down the generations seems to be
mostly in the hands of the cosmologists.
-- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@tt1lock.org Remove lock to reply.
- Next message: Jim McGinn: "Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize"
- Previous message: Jim McGinn: "Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in Hamilton's Model"
- In reply to: CNCabej: ""Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- Next in thread: CNCabej: "Re: "Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- Reply: CNCabej: "Re: "Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|