Re: Evolutionary aspect of oral sex
From: dniphre (dniphre_at_gmail.com)
Date: 12/23/04
- Next message: Brett Aubrey: "Re: Evolutionary aspect of oral sex"
- Previous message: Phil Roberts, Jr.: "Re: "Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- In reply to: Earle Jones: "Evolutionary aspect of oral sex"
- Next in thread: Brett Aubrey: "Re: Evolutionary aspect of oral sex"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 06:12:54 +0000 (UTC)
I don't think oral sex nor hand jobs (sorry, I don't know the formal
term for that) are a product of evolution. Genitalia, mouths, and hands
are our most feeling-sensitive organs. It's just that genitalia was
meant for sex.
- Next message: Brett Aubrey: "Re: Evolutionary aspect of oral sex"
- Previous message: Phil Roberts, Jr.: "Re: "Genes are followers not leaders". Was: Birds of feather..."
- In reply to: Earle Jones: "Evolutionary aspect of oral sex"
- Next in thread: Brett Aubrey: "Re: Evolutionary aspect of oral sex"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]