Re: Publishing scientific information

From: John Edser (edser_at_tpg.com.au)
Date: 01/20/05 

Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:01:49 -0500 (EST)

> > JE:-
> > I insist, like Popper insisted, that only refutable
> > propositions of nature
> > are validly scientific.

> LM:-
> Then, just like Popper, you are wrong.
> Thanks for playing. You can pick up your consolation prize at the door
> when you leave.

JE:-
Thanks. I enjoyed the Neo Darwinistic
side show of Hamilton's strip
tease version of Darwinian fitness.
However I still prefer the main event.

Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

PO Box 266
Church Pt
NSW 2105
Australia

edser@tpg.com.au

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Godels comments about the "true reason" for incompleteness
    ... the farcical nature of this state of ... objection was that you don't know what NAFL means. ... why not formally admit propositions ... clearly is an impredicative construction, for the quantification ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Initialling Quoted Texts
    ... of the first quote, I could ... Why not learn from nature? ... blocks from the _start_ of the quoting process. ... John Edser ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Human design and natural "design"
    ... >> nature has never played Louis Armstrong's ... regarded as being created by Armstrong and not nature in general. ... Regards, ... Independent Researcher ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)