Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather..

From: John Edser (edser_at_tpg.com.au)
Date: 01/22/05 

Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:01:46 -0500 (EST)

Guy Hoelzer <hoelzer@unr.edu>

> >> JM:-
> >> That is why I believe that your 10^15 bits of synaptic connection
> >> information are encoded in the 10^9 bits of the genome.

> > TT
> > Much of the point of nervous systems is to handle learning and
> > situations
> > where behavoural plasticity is needed. Nervous systems absorb
> > information
> > from their environments like a sponges.
> >
> > To discount this effect - and attribute synaptic connection information
> > to the genetic program - is to run the risk of missing what nervous
> > systems are for :-(

> GH:-
> I would have pushed this point a little further than Tim did. If synaptic
> connection information were encoded in the genome, and inflexibly
> manifested
> in developed nervous systems, then those systems would be severely
> constrained from performing the function that we observe them performing.
> Therefore, the hypothesis that such encoded constraints exist seems
> inconsistent with what we observe.

JE:-
Why is only a blind eye
being put to the Haldane's Dilemma
telescope? When this telescope
did not provide gene centric Neo
Darwinists with what they wanted
to see what did they do? They threw
away the telescope! ERGO: nature
must conform to their models, their
models do not have to confrom to
nature which of course qualifies
as first rate arrogance. And what
sort of "scientist" are most of
these arrogant researchers?
Mathematicians. How predictable...

What are they all terrified of seeing?
How many of the just 30,000 or so genes
identified within the human genome
actually constitute genetic junk ?
If none at all please explain how just
30,000 or so non junk genes
can code, on a just a _linear_ basis,
for one entire hertiable human phenotype?
Also, please explain how just a tiny
percentage of this incredibly small
genome can separate man from chimp?

Also, please explain why gene _fitness_
is only assumed to be _lineal_ yet not one
single lineal gene fitness has ever been
documented within nature?

Lastly, would ANYBODY who regards themselves
as possessing out of fashion integrity please
answer the most important question of all:

_____________________________________
        Is mathematics a science?
_____________________________________

My regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

PO Box 266
Church Pt
NSW 2105
Australia

edser@tpg.com.au

Quantcast