sci.bio.evolution
By Thread
737 messages sorted by: [ date ]
Starting: 12/30/04
Ending: 01/31/05
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications John Edser (01/31/05)
- Overlapping fitnesses Perplexed in Peoria (01/30/05)
- What is the Commodity of Fitness? Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
- Article: Parasite genes reveal long sexual history Robert Karl Stonjek (01/29/05)
- Article: Hominid inbreeding left humans vulnerable to disease Robert Karl Stonjek (01/27/05)
- Paper: Testing for clonal propagation Robert Karl Stonjek (01/27/05)
- Article: Is group selection necessary to explain social adaptations in microorganisms? Robert Karl Stonjek (01/27/05)
- Re: Article: Is group selection necessary to explain social adaptations in microorganisms? Perplexed in Peoria (01/28/05)
- Re: Article: Is group selection necessary to explain social adaptations in microorganisms? Jason (01/29/05)
- Re: Article: Is group selection necessary to explain social adaptations in microorganisms? Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
- Re: Article: Is group selection necessary to explain social adaptations in microorganisms? Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
- Article: Darwin's finch beaks, Bmp4, and the developmental origins of novelty Robert Karl Stonjek (01/27/05)
- Haldane's Dilemma IThinkSo (01/27/05)
- Molecular Evolution Jason (01/26/05)
- Evolutionary and Adaptive Systems MSc at University of Sussex, UK Inman Harvey (01/26/05)
- inbreeding ošin (01/26/05)
- JOIN rythmomachy_at_hotpop.com (01/26/05)
- Newsgroup Wirt Atmar (01/26/05)
- Logic of kin selection Joe Felsenstein (01/26/05)
- Re: Logic of kin selection Joe Felsenstein (01/26/05)
- Re: Logic of kin selection Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
- Re: Logic of kin selection Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
- Re: Logic of kin selection John Edser (01/31/05)
- The Making of The King's Invisible Thread Jim McGinn (01/26/05)
- new model for the origin of life awjmuller (01/25/05)
- Newgroup switch TomHendricks474 (01/25/05)
- The hole in the bucket. John Edser (01/24/05)
- Problems with fish to human evolution Krzysztof (01/24/05)
- Joe: "slightly misleading" Jim McGinn (01/24/05)
- Life in the Universe - ET Visitors: Scientists See High Likelihood Brett Aubrey (01/23/05)
- THE EPIGENETIC SYSTEM OF HEREDITY CNCabej (01/22/05)
- Can viruses transfer genetic material between individuals ? Rod Burns (01/22/05)
- Venomous birds? Phil D. (01/22/05)
- Adolf Hitler invented cloning Gactimus (01/22/05)
- Hominid Fossils Unearth Clues to Human Origins nurse607 (01/21/05)
- Y Chromosome Reveals Hidden Sequence nurse607 (01/21/05)
- evolution & culture wasafras_at_yahoo.com (01/21/05)
- Paper: Adaptation to the cost of resistance Robert Karl Stonjek (01/20/05)
- Paper: Group-beneficial traits, frequency-dependent selection and genotypic diversity Robert Karl Stonjek (01/20/05)
- Paper: Ancient DNA Robert Karl Stonjek (01/20/05)
- Joe's Unconditional Frequency Obfuscation Jim McGinn (01/20/05)
- Haldane's Hangover Jim McGinn (01/20/05)
- Re: Haldane's Hangover Tim Tyler (01/21/05)
- Re: Haldane's Hangover Jim McGinn (01/22/05)
- Re: Haldane's Hangover Joe Felsenstein (01/22/05)
- Re: Haldane's Hangover Jim McGinn (01/23/05)
- Re: Haldane's Hangover Jim McGinn (01/25/05)
- Re: Haldane's Hangover Jim McGinn (01/26/05)
- Re: Haldane's Hangover Jim McGinn (01/29/05)
- Re: Haldane's Hangover Jim McGinn (01/29/05)
- Re: Haldane's Hangover Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
- Integrity John Edser (01/20/05)
- Article: Fungus report stirs debate Robert Karl Stonjek (01/20/05)
- 4 word language TomHendricks474 (01/20/05)
- ADMIN: outage last two days evolution_at_darwin.ediacara.org (01/20/05)
- Junk DNA: A hypothesis jeffp (01/18/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/20/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Wirt Atmar (01/20/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Jim McGinn (01/20/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/21/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis EKurtz99 (01/21/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/21/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/21/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/22/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/23/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/27/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/27/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/22/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/23/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/26/05)
- Selection timescale Tim Tyler (01/27/05)
- Re: Selection timescale Perplexed in Peoria (01/27/05)
- Re: Selection timescale Tim Tyler (01/27/05)
- Re: Selection timescale Perplexed in Peoria (01/28/05)
- Re: Selection timescale Tim Tyler (01/29/05)
- Re: Selection timescale Perplexed in Peoria (01/29/05)
- Re: Selection timescale Perplexed in Peoria (01/30/05)
- Re: Selection timescale Perplexed in Peoria (01/27/05)
- Re: Selection timescale John Edser (01/28/05)
- Re: Selection timescale John Edser (01/29/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/27/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis William Morse (01/29/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/23/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Perplexed in Peoria (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis William Morse (01/29/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/29/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis William Morse (01/30/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Anon. (01/30/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis William L Hunt (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Tim Tyler (01/26/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Peter F - for EIMC Internetional Ptd. Lty. (01/22/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/23/05)
- Help from a Creationist! (was Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis) Peter F - for EIMC Internetional Ptd. Lty. (01/22/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Larry Moran (01/21/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Jim McGinn (01/22/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Jim McGinn (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis John Edser (01/24/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Sci.bio.evolution moderation account (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Jim McGinn (01/25/05)
- Re: Junk DNA: A hypothesis Jim McGinn (01/26/05)
- Re: Selection timescale Jim McGinn (01/29/05)
- Article: Natural selection in humans Robert Karl Stonjek (01/18/05)
- 'Correcting' CNS-centered Cabejic conderations by force of EPT philosophical context Peter F - for EIMC Internetional Ptd. Lty. (01/18/05)
- Article: Salt-loving bugs could survive on other worlds Robert Karl Stonjek (01/18/05)
- Evolution Philosophical paranthetic Thumb-twiddling Peter F - for EIMC Internetional Ptd. Lty. (01/17/05)
- Probability of a Birth Defect and Age of Female and Male Parents davidfranit (01/17/05)
- Re: Publishing scientific information John Edser (01/17/05)
- Separating Mathemaics From Reasoned Argument John Edser (01/17/05)
- Re: The Crux of Hamilton's Error! John Edser (01/17/05)
- Fertilization... email_slot_at_yahoo.com (01/15/05)
- Genetic drift Daniel Sch?tz (01/15/05)
- Sun Selection (copy) TomHendricks474_at_cs.com (01/15/05)
- Washburn's fallacy Malcolm (01/15/05)
- RE: Washburn's fallacy John Edser (01/15/05)
- Re: Washburn's fallacy Jim McGinn (01/15/05)
- Re: Washburn's fallacy John Edser (01/17/05)
- Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/18/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. John Edser (01/20/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/21/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. ekurtz99_at_WhoKnowsWhere.com (01/22/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/23/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. John Edser (01/25/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/25/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/26/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/26/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/26/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/26/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. William Morse (01/31/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/26/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. John Edser (01/27/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/28/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. EKurtz99 (01/31/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. John Edser (01/27/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/28/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. John Edser (01/27/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/27/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. John Edser (01/28/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/28/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/29/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/30/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. John Edser (01/29/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/29/05)
- Re: Theories, models, and simplifications. John Edser (01/31/05)
- Re: Washburn's fallacy Perplexed in Peoria (01/18/05)
- Re: Washburn's fallacy Jim McGinn (01/18/05)
- Re: Washburn's fallacy Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
- Re: Washburn's fallacy Jim McGinn (01/23/05)
- Re: Washburn's fallacy Jim McGinn (01/30/05)
- Theories, models, and simplifications. Perplexed in Peoria (01/18/05)
- Re: Washburn's fallacy John Edser (01/21/05)
- Article: RNAi active in the nucleus? Robert Karl Stonjek (01/15/05)
- Re "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS". Was Birds of feather... CNCabej (01/15/05)
- Re: The Crux of Hamilton's Error!) John Edser (01/14/05)
- Take Joe's Word For It Jim McGinn (01/14/05)
- Modern eugenics, right or wrong? cyrakis_at_yahoo.com (01/14/05)
- A Question Of Integrity John Edser (01/14/05)
- A female peacock's sex-change peculiarity Peter F - for EIMC Internetional Ptd. Lty. (01/14/05)
- Joe's New Angle Jim McGinn (01/14/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. CNCabej (01/14/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. Perplexed in Peoria (01/15/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. Tim Tyler (01/21/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. Guy Hoelzer (01/21/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. Perplexed in Peoria (01/22/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. CNCabej (01/23/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. Perplexed in Peoria (01/25/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. Perplexed in Peoria (01/21/05)
- My interpretation of Cabej's point - in brief: (was Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. Peter F - for EIMC Internetional Ptd. Lty. (01/22/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. Tim Tyler (01/21/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. John Edser (01/22/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. John Edser (01/24/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. John Edser (01/25/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. John Edser (01/27/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS." Was: Birds of feather.. Perplexed in Peoria (01/15/05)
- Article: Large mammals once dined on dinosaurs Robert Karl Stonjek (01/14/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS". Was: Birds of feather CNCabej (01/14/05)
- THE EPIGENETIC SYSTEM OF HEREDITY CNCabej (01/13/05)
- Hamilton's Rule: A Matter of Integrity John Edser (01/13/05)
- Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/12/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Guy Hoelzer (01/13/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Peter F - for EIMC Internetional Ptd. Lty. (01/13/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Perplexed in Peoria (01/13/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Guy Hoelzer (01/14/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Perplexed in Peoria (01/15/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Joe Felsenstein (01/18/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Guy Hoelzer (01/20/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed William Morse (01/23/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed William Morse (01/17/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Guy Hoelzer (01/18/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed William Morse (01/20/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Perplexed in Peoria (01/18/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Guy Hoelzer (01/20/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Perplexed in Peoria (01/22/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Guy Hoelzer (01/25/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Perplexed in Peoria (01/26/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Guy Hoelzer (01/27/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Perplexed in Peoria (01/27/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Guy Hoelzer (01/27/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Perplexed in Peoria (01/13/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Malcolm (01/13/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/13/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/13/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/13/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/14/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/15/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/15/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/17/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/17/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/18/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/18/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/20/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Joe Felsenstein (01/20/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/20/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/21/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/21/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/21/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/22/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/23/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Perplexed in Peoria (01/23/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/23/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Jim McGinn (01/24/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/24/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/24/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/25/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed John Edser (01/28/05)
- Re: Perpetually Perplexed Guy Hoelzer (01/13/05)
- Hamilton's Rule: A Matter of Integrity Name And Address Supplied (01/12/05)
- Workshop @ ECAl 2005 - Call for Papers E Izquierdo (01/12/05)
- Hermaphroditism - why not? zahirkus_at_yahoo.com (01/11/05)
- Re "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS". Was Birds of feather... CNCabej (01/11/05)
- The Crux of Hamilton's Error John Edser (01/11/05)
- Hamilton's Rule: A Matter of Integrity John Edser (01/11/05)
- The Crux of Hamilton's Error Jim McGinn (01/11/05)
- THE EPIGENETIC SYSTEM OF HEREDITY CNCabej (01/10/05)
- Support for UV Affect in Origin (possible resend) TomHendricks474_at_cs.com (01/10/05)
- Young Stars and UV TomHendricks474 (01/10/05)
- doubly puzzling orange mites John Vreeland (01/10/05)
- Fluke Origin? - Not reasonable TomHendricks474 (01/10/05)
- the end of natural human evolution? joelapplegate_at_hotmail.com (01/10/05)
- Re: the end of natural human evolution? Joachim Pense (01/11/05)
- Re: the end of natural human evolution? Brett Aubrey (01/11/05)
- Re: the end of natural human evolution? Anthony Cerrato (01/11/05)
- Re: the end of natural human evolution? Tim Tyler (01/11/05)
- Re: the end of natural human evolution? Joel (01/13/05)
- Genetic measurements in humans Daniel Sch?tz (01/09/05)
- Workshop @ Ecal 2005 Fernando Almeida e Costa (01/09/05)
- What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/07/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/01/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/01/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in EKurtz99 (01/03/05)
- 'Crockery&Pottery' versus Creativity&Potentials [was Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in Peter F (01/04/05)
- Re: 'Crockery&Pottery' versus Creativity&Potentials [was Re: What ekurtz99_at_WhoKnowsWhere.com (01/05/05)
- Re: 'Crockery&Pottery' versus Creativity&Potentials [was Re: What Peter F (01/05/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in EKurtz99 (01/03/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in EKurtz99 (01/03/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/03/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/03/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/04/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/04/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/04/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/04/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/06/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/06/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/06/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/06/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/06/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in John Edser (01/06/05)
- Article: Genome project chimp dies unexpectedly Robert Karl Stonjek (01/07/05)
- What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in Name And Address Supplied (01/06/05)
- Toes John Ings (01/06/05)
- Paper: The rate of DNA evolution: Effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock Robert Karl Stonjek (01/06/05)
- ICNC'05-FSKD'05 Call for Papers: Changsha China hepu.deng_at_rmit.edu.au (01/06/05)
- Paper: Evolution driven by differential dispersal within a wild bird population Robert Karl Stonjek (01/06/05)
- Evolutionary Psychology Literature Recommendation Sebastian Auer (01/04/05)
- Re: Evolutionary Psychology Literature Recommendation pz (01/05/05)
- Re: Evolutionary Psychology Literature Recommendation sigoldberg1_at_gmail.com (01/05/05)
- Re: Evolutionary Psychology Literature Recommendation shawtuse (01/05/05)
- Re: Evolutionary Psychology Literature Recommendation William Morse (01/06/05)
- Re: Evolutionary Psychology Literature Recommendation Sebastian Auer (01/07/05)
- Hamiton's Rule: Solution to a Nonexistent Problem John Edser (01/04/05)
- How long since the last major interchromosomal translocation in the human lineage? sigoldberg1_at_gmail.com (01/04/05)
- Re: "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS". Was: Birds of feather... CNCabej (01/03/05)
- Re "GENES ARE FOLLOWERS NOT LEADERS". Was Birds of feather... CNCabej (01/03/05)
- Jim's Hamilton's rule prize Name And Address Supplied (01/03/05)
- Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize William Morse (01/05/05)
- Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize EKurtz99 (01/05/05)
- Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize John Edser (01/06/05)
- Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize Jim McGinn (01/11/05)
- Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize Jim McGinn (01/13/05)
- Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize John Edser (01/13/05)
- Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize John Edser (01/13/05)
- Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize John Edser (01/13/05)
- Re: Jim's Hamilton's rule prize John Edser (01/13/05)
- Key steps in the evolution of sex - as I nonexpertly fantasize them :-) Peter F (01/03/05)
- "Natural Selection" by Darwin Raphael Goubet (01/03/05)
- My perspective on McGinn'ism/Jim as a near-EvolutionPhilosophicalType fighter. (Apropos Re: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct) Peter F (01/03/05)
- Hamiton's Rule: Solution to a Nonexistent Problem Jim McGinn (01/03/05)
- "IT WORKS!" John Edser (01/01/05)
- Re: Paper: The evolution of large size: how does Cope's Rule work? TomHendricks474 (01/01/05)
- Support for UV Affect in Origin (copy) TomHendricks474_at_cs.com (01/01/05)
- Dinosaurs on a smaller earth Ian Harvey (12/31/04)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in Hamilton's Model Jim McGinn (12/31/04)
- Re: gould TomHendricks474 (12/31/04)
- Re: Music's place in evolution TomHendricks474 (12/31/04)
- Re: Paper: The place of metabolism in the origin of life TomHendricks474 (12/31/04)
- Re: Haldane's Pub Rule Jim McGinn (12/31/04)
- Re: Biochemical evolution anurag.sethi_at_gmail.com (12/31/04)
- vaccinology/evolution of immune system douga_at_techline.com (12/31/04)
- Re: vaccinology/evolution of immune system Michael Laschober (01/01/05)
- Re: vaccinology/evolution of immune system deowll (01/03/05)
- Re: vaccinology/evolution of immune system roninfromde_at_yahoo.com (01/03/05)
- Re: vaccinology/evolution of immune system douga_at_techline.com (01/04/05)
- Re: vaccinology/evolution of immune system twloehfelm_at_gmail.com (01/05/05)
- Re: vaccinology/evolution of immune system twloehfelm_at_gmail.com (01/05/05)
- Re: DebunkingCementig EKurtz99 (12/31/04)
- Re: Plants, phylogenetic "trees", and jumping genes Tim Tyler (12/31/04)
- Re: A New Species of Man? Tim Tyler (12/31/04)
- Re: Exactly what are "recessive genes"? Tim Tyler (12/31/04)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? Brett Aubrey (12/31/04)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? deowll (12/31/04)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? Brett Aubrey (12/31/04)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? Brett Aubrey (01/03/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? sigoldberg1_at_gmail.com (01/03/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? syvanen_at_ucdavis.edu (01/04/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? tinyurl.com/uh3t (01/09/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? William Morse (01/11/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? tinyurl.com/uh3t (01/13/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? Perplexed in Peoria (01/13/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? Tim Tyler (01/13/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? Perplexed in Peoria (01/14/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? Tim Tyler (01/15/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? William Morse (01/14/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? Tim Tyler (01/15/05)
- Re: How come every new race isn't destroyed by inbreeding? tinyurl.com/uh3t (01/13/05)
- Re: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct Tim Tyler (12/31/04)
- Re: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct Anon. (12/31/04)
- Re: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct deowll (12/31/04)
- Re: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct Jim McGinn (12/31/04)
- Re: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct Jim McGinn (12/31/04)
- Re: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct Jim McGinn (01/01/05)
- Re: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct TomHendricks474 (01/01/05)
- Re: Human Evolution is Categorically Distinct Jim McGinn (01/03/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Anon. (12/31/04)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Joe Felsenstein (12/31/04)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Jim McGinn (12/31/04)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Jim McGinn (01/03/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Joe Felsenstein (01/04/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Tim Tyler (01/05/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg EKurtz99 (01/06/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Anon. (01/06/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg EKurtz99 (01/07/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Perplexed in Peoria (01/07/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Joe Felsenstein (01/04/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg John Edser (01/03/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg John Edser (01/03/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Jim McGinn (01/05/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg John Edser (01/05/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Jim McGinn (01/06/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg John Edser (01/07/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Jim McGinn (01/10/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg John Edser (01/11/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Jim McGinn (01/11/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg John Edser (01/13/05)
- Re: McGinn's disproof of Hardy-Weinberg Jim McGinn (01/14/05)
- Re: What is R (relatedness) Suppose to Represent in Perplexed in Peoria (12/31/04)
- Re: Evolutionary aspect of oral sex Earle Jones (12/31/04)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Perplexed in Peoria (12/31/04)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Tim Tyler (12/31/04)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Perplexed in Peoria (01/01/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Tim Tyler (01/01/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Perplexed in Peoria (01/03/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Tim Tyler (01/03/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Perplexed in Peoria (01/04/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Tim Tyler (01/05/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Perplexed in Peoria (01/05/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Tim Tyler (01/06/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Tim Tyler (01/05/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Perplexed in Peoria (01/06/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Tim Tyler (01/06/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Tim Tyler (01/11/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Perplexed in Peoria (01/01/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution John Edser (01/06/05)
- Re: The "fuel" of evolution Tim Tyler (12/31/04)
- Re: Need Help In Zooplanktons.. TomHendricks474 (12/31/04)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Perplexed in Peoria (12/31/04)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/01/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/01/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/03/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense John Edser (01/04/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/05/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/06/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/06/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/06/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense John Edser (01/06/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense John Edser (01/06/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense John Edser (01/07/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/09/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/10/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/11/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/11/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/12/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/14/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/15/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/20/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/23/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/25/05)
- Re: Hamilton's Nonsense Jim McGinn (01/25/05)
- Re: Evolution and other planets Anthony Cerrato (12/30/04)
Last message date: 01/31/05
Archived on: 01/31/05 GMT
737 messages sorted by: [ date ]
