Re: Article: Hominid inbreeding left humans vulnerable to disease
From: William Morse (wdmorse_at_twcny.rr.com)
Date: 02/04/05
- Next message: John Edser: "Re: The hole in the bucket."
- Previous message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Theories, models, and simplifications."
- Next in thread: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Article: Hominid inbreeding left humans vulnerable to disease"
- Reply: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Article: Hominid inbreeding left humans vulnerable to disease"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:33:58 -0500 (EST)
"Robert Karl Stonjek" <rstonjek@bigpond.net.au> wrote in
news:ctbnni$10i8$1@darwin.ediacara.org:
> Hominid inbreeding left humans vulnerable to disease
> 12:48 25 January 2005
> Will Knight
>
> A lack of mates among human ancestors that lived million years ago has
> left modern humans more vulnerable to genetic disease, a new study
> suggests. Researchers compared samples from the genomes of more than
> 1000 people with those of chimpanzees to see how much genetic mutation
> has occurred in the two species since they diverged from a common
> hominid ancestor, about six million years ago. They also made
> comparisons with another closely related pair of species, rats and
> mice.
>
> They focused on portions of DNA close to protein-coding genes. These
> segments are thought to regulate the activation of these genes.
> The researchers calculated that these stretches of human and chimp DNA
> contained approximately 140,000 non-advantageous mutations, higher
> than expected and well above the number of retained genetic mutations
> seen in rats and mice. The mutations occur naturally but make both
> chimps and humans more susceptible to diseases with a genetic basis,
> such as cancer.
>
> Evolutionary bottleneck
>
> The researchers believe the high rate of mutations is seen because the
> hominid ancestor to both species went through an evolutionary
> bottleneck, when its breeding population was limited to only about
> 10,000 individuals.
>
> This meant that the process of pruning out damaging mutations via
> natural selection of the fittest mates was more difficult and slower.
> In contrast, rats and mice have descended from a much larger
> population, leaving them less susceptible to genetic diseases.
This makes little sense. Bottlenecks should produce inbreeding, which
should reduce heterozygosity. Bottlenecks may fix some deleterious
mutations, but 140,000?
Yours,
Bill Morse
- Next message: John Edser: "Re: The hole in the bucket."
- Previous message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Theories, models, and simplifications."
- Next in thread: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Article: Hominid inbreeding left humans vulnerable to disease"
- Reply: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Article: Hominid inbreeding left humans vulnerable to disease"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|