Re: "Kooks" dominating sbe
From: Jim McGinn (jimmcginn_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: William L Hunt: "Halting NS experiment"
- Previous message: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Paper: siRNA and miRNA: an insight into RISCs"
- In reply to: John Edser: ""Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Next in thread: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: "Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Reply: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: "Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Reply: David Iain Greig: "Re: "Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Reply: Joe Felsenstein: "Re: "Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:51:38 -0500 (EST)
David Iain Greig wrote:
> Anything that would possibly disprove their
> pet theories is immediately to be dropped
> into the Pit of Ignore.
Here's some questions that Joe, Guy, Josh, Peoria, Edser, malcolm and
others have "dropped into the Pit of Ignore."
Are genes that are IBD different from genes that
are not IBD in terms of their causative
properties? Yes, No.
If they are different in terms of their causative
properties what is the PROXIMATE mechanism by which
they produce this difference is causative properties?
I mean, do genes somehow know whether or not they are
IBD and act accordingly? How do they know this?
If they are not different in terms of their causative
properties then why even bother to distinguish between
them?
Jim
- Next message: William L Hunt: "Halting NS experiment"
- Previous message: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Paper: siRNA and miRNA: an insight into RISCs"
- In reply to: John Edser: ""Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Next in thread: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: "Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Reply: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: "Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Reply: David Iain Greig: "Re: "Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Reply: Joe Felsenstein: "Re: "Kooks" dominating sbe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
