Re: Labels and Obfuscations
ekurtz99_at_WhoKnowsWhere.com
Date: 02/23/05
- Next message: Jim McGinn: "In a very strange sense"
- Previous message: Anon.: "Re: McGinn disagrees with Felsenstein"
- In reply to: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Labels and Obfuscations"
- Next in thread: John Edser: "RE: Labels and Obfuscations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:42:19 -0500 (EST)
Perplexed in Peoria wrote:
> "EKurtz99" <EKurtz99@TwilightZone.com> wrote in message news:cvej8e$1vds$1@darwin.ediacara.org...
>
>>Sounds like you are in the early stages of Kook Enabler's Dementia, an
>>irreversible neurological disorder brought on by endlessly reading the
>>unreadable and trying to understand the incomprehensible. Pretty soon you
>>will be proclaiming the truth of the prophecies of Nostradamus,
>
>
> Nostradamus was a Fascist who wore no clothes. But he was right
> on regarding metazoan embryology.
>
>
>>declaring Astrology an empirical science,
>
>
> Nope. It is an anti-Popperian non-empirical road to correctly
> analyzing the psyches of persons you have never met.
>
>
>>and telling anyone who will listen about the
>>Healing Power of Crystals.
>
>
> I don't know about healing, but they beat sun-cycles as a quick
> solution to the origin of life. ;-)
>
> You have to realize, I don't read ALL kooks. Just sbe and
> sci.space.policy. I've never even visited talk.origins.
> You have me confused with Larry Moran and John Wilkins. ;-)
..but you are a devotee of the most prolific kook of all; keeping up
with him alone qualifies as "endlessly reading the unreadable etc".
- Next message: Jim McGinn: "In a very strange sense"
- Previous message: Anon.: "Re: McGinn disagrees with Felsenstein"
- In reply to: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Labels and Obfuscations"
- Next in thread: John Edser: "RE: Labels and Obfuscations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
