A hearing or a reading
From: Gil Lawton (gillawton_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Article: Retrovirus struck ancestors of chimps and gorillas"
- Previous message: Bill Breitmayer: "Re: Question about the function of introns"
- Next in thread: William Morse: "Re: A hearing or a reading"
- Reply: William Morse: "Re: A hearing or a reading"
- Reply: gillawton_at_earthlink.net: "Re: A hearing or a reading"
- Reply: Jim McGinn: "Re: A hearing or a reading"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:43:13 -0500 (EST)
(Words of jimmenegay)
I'm mostly going to avoid the Gould pro-and-con debate, except to totally
endorse the above comment about Dennett. In "Darwin's Dangerous Idea",
Dennett completely misrepresents Gould, and then demolishes a straw man of
his own (de)construction.
I thought that the "brick" was a useful and interesting commentary on
evolutionary theory, but I agree with the anti-Gould contingent that
it is inappropriate as a survey of evolutionary theory.
(Gil's response)
Thank you, Jim. Your comments above strike me as mature, objective,
dispassionate
and absent any polemical windmill jousting.
My love of books is like the love I had and have for my deceased older
brother, a bona
fide genius, who, though he had the most sweeping comprehension of many good
and
valuable things in this world (including a phenomenal rate of survival of
his thoracic
surgical patients, the most irascible of tempers and a seeming lack of
regard for
personal relationships and for handling his finances of any man I've ever
known.
He lived and died both heroically and tragically, both creatively and
destructively --
tearing down all that he built up, beyond his professional results.
What should I do with imperfect people and imperfect books, throw out the
silverware
with the garbage?
My choice is to reject a book on one basis, only -- that being if it do
nothing but paint
a polemical blindness, or if it merely state the obvious, or if it simply is
predictable and
lukewarm warm.
One thing I hope to avoid is condemning too assertively a person I have not
given a
hearing to, or a book I have not given a read.
g
- Next message: Guy Hoelzer: "Re: Article: Retrovirus struck ancestors of chimps and gorillas"
- Previous message: Bill Breitmayer: "Re: Question about the function of introns"
- Next in thread: William Morse: "Re: A hearing or a reading"
- Reply: William Morse: "Re: A hearing or a reading"
- Reply: gillawton_at_earthlink.net: "Re: A hearing or a reading"
- Reply: Jim McGinn: "Re: A hearing or a reading"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|