Re: Hamilton meets Matata
From: Tim Tyler (tim_at_tt1lock.org)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: Tim Tyler: "Re: Species Selection Redux"
- Previous message: Tim Tyler: "Re: OOL VI - Chirality and Sugars."
- In reply to: Jim McGinn: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Next in thread: Malcolm: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Reply: Malcolm: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Reply: Malcolm: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:34:56 -0500 (EST)
Jim McGinn <jimmcginn@yahoo.com> wrote or quoted:
> Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
> > This is neither altruistic nor kin selection, and indicates that kin
> > selection is coincident as far as the animals involved are concerned
> > ie they do not seek out those actually related, but those with whom
> > they are familiar
>
> I think what you are suggesting here is that if Hamilton's theories
> were accurate we'd expect some kind of instinct or ability to
> distinguish between kin and nonkin and focus assistance only (or almost
> only) on kin. [...]
You are suggesting that organisms might invent and use paternity testing?
I notice that that has actually happened - albeit quite recently.
-- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@tt1lock.org Remove lock to reply.
- Next message: Tim Tyler: "Re: Species Selection Redux"
- Previous message: Tim Tyler: "Re: OOL VI - Chirality and Sugars."
- In reply to: Jim McGinn: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Next in thread: Malcolm: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Reply: Malcolm: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Reply: Malcolm: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|