Re: Hamilton meets Matata
From: William Morse (wdmorse_at_twcny.rr.com)
Date: 03/12/05
- Next message: Brett Aubrey: "Re: This Year Darwin Awards"
- Previous message: TomHendricks474_at_cs.com: "Thermophiles and Selection Pressure Model"
- In reply to: Jim McGinn: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Next in thread: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Reply: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:16:50 -0500 (EST)
"Jim McGinn" <jimmcginn@yahoo.com> wrote in news:d0qtap$17sc$1
@darwin.ediacara.org:
>
> Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
>> I'm just wondering how Hamilton theories are applied to real life
> situations
>> like the one involving Kanzi, probably the most famous Bonobo (Pan
>> paniscus).
I was trying to respond to RKS's original question, not Jim's follow,but I
accidentally deleted it, so I will try to remember what it is that RKS
questioned.
First I would note that humans also adopt children, knowing full well that
they are not their own and are not related. The point - and it has often
been made - is that there is a difference between the reason a behavior
evolved and the mechanism that causes the behavior. It seems likely that
the tendency towards adoption shown by some primates evolved largely as a
result of kin selection (there may well be other causes, including selfish
ones such as group status and better long term survival of offspring raised
with siblings) - but the mechanism is simply "love of children", so Kanzi
won't care if the adoptee is unrelated.
Yours,
Bill Morse
- Next message: Brett Aubrey: "Re: This Year Darwin Awards"
- Previous message: TomHendricks474_at_cs.com: "Thermophiles and Selection Pressure Model"
- In reply to: Jim McGinn: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Next in thread: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Reply: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]