Re: Thermophiles and Selection Pressure Model
From: Joe Felsenstein (joe_at_removethispart.gs.washington.edu)
Date: 03/20/05
- Next message: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Previous message: Tim Tyler: "Re: Psychologists in biology world"
- In reply to: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Thermophiles and Selection Pressure Model"
- Next in thread: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Thermophiles and Selection Pressure Model"
- Reply: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Thermophiles and Selection Pressure Model"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:02:09 -0500 (EST)
In article <d1dr05$1994$1@darwin.ediacara.org>,
Perplexed in Peoria <jimmenegay@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>One more request (to anyone that wishes to respond). My training in
>statistics is not very good. I made the mistake back in college of
>taking my statistics course from the math department, rather than
>from the economics department. I need a textbook to teach myself from.
>The ones I have tried recently are too cook-bookish and elementary.
>Would you care to recommend a text that covers the philosophical
>fundamentals rigorously, provides a good survey of the practical tools,
>and doesn't presume that I am frightened by subscripts?
>
>As part of my investigation of OOL, I think that I am going to need
>to develop some techniques to make inferences from other kinds of
>evolutionary data besides gene sequences - for example, I would like
>to be able to draw some conclusions from a sample of metabolic pathway
>graphs.
I can't really give an up-to-date answer, but there is now a level
of statistics course that is intermediate between the old "cookbook"
courses which were dreadful, and the full-bore full-year math stat sequences
where you learn a lot of proof technology such as martingales and
moment-generating functions.
If you can find one of these intermediate-level texts that may be just
what you want. I don't know the names of most of them. If you find a book
and want to know whether it is of this level, look in the index. If there
is an entry under "likelihood" but not much under moment-generating functions,
it might be right. Cookbook texts consider likelihood "too advanced", which
is why, when I went around lecturing on phylogenies and likelihoods, from
the 1980s on, I always had to start by explaining to the mystified audience
for 20 minutes what likelihood was, starting with the usual coin-tossing
example.
One way to start is to find out what texts are in use at your nearest
University (Case Western Reserve University? Stat 345-346?).
-- Joe Felsenstein joe@removethispart.gs.washington.edu Department of Genome Sciences and Department of Biology, University of Washington, Box 357730, Seattle, WA 98195-7730 USA
- Next message: Robert Karl Stonjek: "Re: Hamilton meets Matata"
- Previous message: Tim Tyler: "Re: Psychologists in biology world"
- In reply to: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Thermophiles and Selection Pressure Model"
- Next in thread: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Thermophiles and Selection Pressure Model"
- Reply: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Thermophiles and Selection Pressure Model"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|