Re: Reproductive Excess: Is Required

A correction of a typo in my previous posting, in case it caused confusion:

In article <d53hn9$2s84$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Joe Felsenstein <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I think that here we can see ReMine's error. He calculates a reproductive
>excess needed to accompany substitution, even substitution that does result
>from a threat to the continuation of the species, and he calls that a "cost".

I left out a "not". The correct lines are:

I think that here we can see ReMine's error. He calculates a reproductive
excess needed to accompany substitution, even substitution that does not result
from a threat to the continuation of the species, and he calls that a "cost".

--
Joe Felsenstein joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Genome Sciences and Department of Biology,
University of Washington, Box 357730, Seattle, WA 98195-7730 USA

.

Quantcast