Re: Felsenstein and reproductive excess
- From: Wirt Atmar <atmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:56:40 -0400 (EDT)
Walter asks:
> The remarkable thing is that evolutionists still allow those errors to
> thrive. Why? Why do evolutionists allow such fundamental confusions
> to thrive? Why don't evolutionists resolve the matter among
> themselves?
We "evolutionists" *have* resolved the matter among ourselves, quite
some time ago. As you've long suspected, I think, there is a cabal of
evolutionists that meets monthly and decides among themselves what is to
be said to be true and what is not.
Although we rarely do this for outsiders, let me invite you to the next
meeting. About 40,000 of us meet on the third Friday of each month at
the Denny's on the corner of Main and Maciver in Bishop, California to
hash out the month's business, determining what has changed and what has
remained stable in the world of evolutionary biology, if anything.
Try to be early as booth space rapidly fills up.
[moderator's chide: Naughty Wirt. Sarcasm does not become you. - JAH]
Wirt Atmar
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Felsenstein and reproductive excess
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: Felsenstein and reproductive excess
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: Felsenstein and reproductive excess
- References:
- Felsenstein and reproductive excess
- From: Walter ReMine
- Felsenstein and reproductive excess
- Prev by Date: Re: Reproductive Excess: Is Required
- Next by Date: RE: Felsenstein and reproductive excess
- Previous by thread: Re: ReMine and reproductive excess
- Next by thread: Re: Felsenstein and reproductive excess
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|