Re: Singing as prerequisite (or aid) to language.
- From: William Morse <wdmorse@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:37:10 -0400 (EDT)
EKurtz99@xxxxxxx wrote in news:d99ls8$150o$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
EKurtz made a number of comments, many of which I agree with, and I snipped
much, but:
> Intellectual rigor in theorizing about human evolution requires at the
> very least that proffered hypotheses add to our understanding and are
> not mere unsupported stories. Theorists in this domain, and some
> contributors to this thread, feel that it is enough to construct a
> plausible adaptive story and leave it at that. eg communal singing is
> more efficient than grooming as a social glue in primate societies -
> so why are there no singing apes?
Just a quick note in the interests of rigor, or honesty, or something:
there are singing non-human apes - the gibbons. (My explanation for this is
that they are monogamous - communal singing is not involved.)
Yours,
Bill Morse
.
- References:
- Singing as prerequisite (or aid) to language.
- From: Anthony Cerrato
- Re: Singing as prerequisite (or aid) to language.
- From: EKurtz99
- Singing as prerequisite (or aid) to language.
- Prev by Date: Re: Singing as prerequisite (or aid) to language.
- Next by Date: Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
- Previous by thread: Re: Singing as prerequisite (or aid) to language.
- Next by thread: Rigor - was: Singing as prerequisite (or aid) to language.
- Index(es):