Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
- From: EKurtz99@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
> <EKurtz99@xxxxxxx> wrote
> > But what use would that be? He would still be stupid and illogical;
> > discussions with him would still go nowhere.
Malcolm wrote:
> My discussions with John haven't gone nowhere.
Example?
> His points are original, so
> they force an original response, or at least a conventional response with
> some re-presentation.
Then perhaps you would like to explain the principle behind "Hamilton's
Rule in the Mirror" to us.
> I agree that there is a problem with tone. It is always a difficult
> situation when some members of the ng hold philosophical posts of great
> worldly honour whilst others cannot even get work published in academic
> journals.
Edser has been encouraged to publish on several occasions, eg:
http://tinyurl.com/8sdmd
But he didn't. Its certainly true that you will not get published if
you don't try.
> In monasteries or armies or similar institutions where members come from a
> wide variety of backgrounds harmony is usually achieved by having many rules
> of etiquette. That's maybe what we need, if we are to create a cultured and
> civilised group in which ideas thrive and which is a credit to observers
> like Walter ReMine,
Why would we wish to be a credit to observers? And why ReMine, who has,
as far as I can tell, has simply repeated "cost is confused in the
literature" and "Ewens and Crow said I was correct" ad nauseum for the
last couple of months.
> who seems to have been here on a scouting mission. We
> wouldn't want him to report back to his friends that evolutionists consider
> each other stupid and illogical kooks who evade arguments, would we?
But we also we would not wish him to report that we suffer crackpots
gladly.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
- From: Malcolm
- Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
- Prev by Date: Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
- Next by Date: Re: Singing as prerequisite (or aid) to language.
- Previous by thread: Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
- Next by thread: Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|