Re: sbe & philosophy
- From: "ErikW" <bryophyta@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:31:00 -0400 (EDT)
g wrote:
> > P.S. It sure is great that s.b.e./Josh allows 'evolutionary philosophy
> > type'
> > thinking to flourish amongst explanatory approaches that attempts focused
> > on
> > representing evolution with figures and formulas!
> > Thank you Josh! %-]
>
> Peter, Josh and ALL ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS in sbe:
>
> Message received Peter, loud and clear.
>
> To the rest of you, let me ask: Does Peter speak for all?
>
> [moderator's note: Don't be silly: I'm not entirely sure Peter
> even speaks for Peter. Bluntly, I'm the only one who decides who
> posts here and who doesn't (and I haven't done anything to Walter,
> either, he's just fallen silent for some reason). If people respond
> to your posts, then you're doing something useful. -JAH]
>
> If you do not like my questions and comments, you need not ask Josh
> to censor them. In fact I shall make it easy for you.
>
> UNLESS YOU ASK ME TO COME BACK, I shall honor Peter's
> objection.
Did he object? I thought he was doing the opposite. As usual though, I
don't (fully) understand Peter's post. I do enjoy reading his posts (!)
but I wouldn't dare replying to the bits and pieces that I actually
understand for fear of him going into second gear on me.
>
> Until and unless you ask for more,
>
> Bye,
>
>
> g
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sbe & philosophy
- From: Peter F
- Re: sbe & philosophy
- References:
- sbe & philosophy
- From: g
- sbe & philosophy
- Prev by Date: Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
- Next by Date: Re: [evol-psych] That Old Magic - Evolutionary Psychology, Part I
- Previous by thread: sbe & philosophy
- Next by thread: Re: sbe & philosophy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading