Re: sbe & philosophy
- From: "Peter F" <notdisclosed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:44:08 -0400 (EDT)
"ErikW" <bryophyta@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d9k7t4$1rn2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > UNLESS YOU ASK ME TO COME BACK, I shall honor Peter's
> > objection.
>
> Did he object? I thought he was doing the opposite.
That was exactly what I thought I did.
It nice to be correctly interpreted - for once.
So thank you, ErikW!
But yet again - we might both be wrong about what "g" meant. :-\
People truly _are_ full of surprises!
Especially here where all the clues we can cotton on to are their
scripts and occasional smileys. %-)
P
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sbe & philosophy
- From: g
- Re: sbe & philosophy
- References:
- sbe & philosophy
- From: g
- Re: sbe & philosophy
- From: ErikW
- sbe & philosophy
- Prev by Date: Re: The Anti Science Art Of Evasion
- Next by Date: Re: Essay: What is Life?
- Previous by thread: Re: sbe & philosophy
- Next by thread: Re: sbe & philosophy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|