Two Points
- From: TomHendricks474@xxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:44:15 -0400 (EDT)
Looking at the origin - there are two basics that
I think many miss.
1. If the sun heat cycle is not the power source for the origin,
then take it out of your scenario and suggest how life
could begin without it. I don't think anyone can.
Nor can they take out the sun/ temperature cycle that puts
the earth in the temperature zone that allows for
liquid water.
So I would suggest we are left with the fact that there
must be a sun/heat cycle for the origin. The real question
is how much emphasis should we put on it - not if we should
consider it or not.
2. Another aspect of the sun/heat cycle that I've never
heard anyone but me mention, is this. If there was no
variation in the sun heat cycle then life could not have
variants - and could not further 'adapt' or become more
stable in that environment.
We are left with only these other possibilities -
a heat source that is not cyclical but random and/or
a heat source that is constant without variation.
Neither would allow for the origin.
Tom Hendricks
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two Points
- From: g
- Re: Two Points
- Prev by Date: Article: On Cell Movements During Gastruation
- Next by Date: Re: specialization momentum
- Previous by thread: Article: On Cell Movements During Gastruation
- Next by thread: Re: Two Points
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
