Re: my email address
- From: "g" <gillawton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:22:29 -0400 (EDT)
"g" <gillawton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:...
>
> "Peter F" <notdisclosed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:d9rsn0$1a90$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> "g" <gillawton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:d9qdb1$qot$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> INVITATION TO INTERESTED
>>> PARTICIPATION IN A TEAM EFFORT:
>>>
>>
>> I tentatively like your (entire) idea.
>>
>> I do because _I would like to see_: constructive progressive-minded
>> people
>> deliberately trying to integrate new science-aligned ideas,
>> and, an end to inefficient intractable rehashing of old arguments.
>>
>> IOW, I would like to see that "old (theoretical) wheels" were put to
>> use,
>> and set to roll, rather than being constantly and _needlessly_
>> rebalanced, reinvented, or caused to get bogged.
>>
>> P
>
> Who knows? I might even learn to spell recalcitrance.
>
> (>:)
>
> g
No, no, no... NOT recalcitrance, either, because that denotes a reluctance
to comply with authority (even where it might be the wiser course), nor
INTRANSIGENCE... which denotes an unwillingness to budge from a
fortified (and perhaps extreme) position, no matter what.
But look what happens when the two concepts are merged. Whether it was
no more than a serendipitous booboo, or a Freudian (absent any sexual
innuendo) merging of the two, the coinage "incalcitrance" can be implied
to transcend the two in describing the conceptual intersection between that
of an original but zealous idealist, unwilling to bow to established
(political
or intellectual) authority, together with a pundit unwilling to examine the
idealist's ideas for possible merits, on the other. Deadlock !
A forced inference? Perhaps. But at the very least poignant and
provocative
of the idea of what is NOT going on here today.
It's the best of two worlds. It's synergy. It's catalytic cookin', folks !
Remember where you saw first, on good ol' sbe !
(;>)
g
.
- Prev by Date: Re: specialization momentum
- Next by Date: Re: Fundamental theorems, dilemmas, fitness, and information.
- Previous by thread: Re: my email address
- Next by thread: Article: Bacteria Pull Off Photosynthesis sans Sunlight
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
