Re: my email address

"Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmenegay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d9utnk$2b1j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Peter F" <notdisclosed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d9uocj$28st$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > "Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmenegay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:d9tb6j$1qt3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > "Peter F" <notdisclosed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:d9rsn0$1a90$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > "g" <gillawton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > news:d9qdb1$qot$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > INVITATION TO INTERESTED
> > > > > PARTICIPATION IN A TEAM EFFORT:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I tentatively like your (entire) idea.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Werner Heisenberg might disapprove of my calling attention to this,
> > > but ...

No need to have concerns about that chap, cause he collapsed years ago!

> > > May I point out that even as Morse and Wilkins are discussing
> > > isolation mechanisms and their status as adaptations on another
> > > thread, we seem to have such a process unfolding before our eyes
> > > right here.
> > >
> > > Moreover, the participants are providing reports of their own
> > > motivations for us to examine. Fascinating.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > This is great!
> > Not only am I my own EPT enthusiast, but now I also have become a
species
> > under Perplexed('s) scrutiny - of as well!!
> > %-}
>
> Well, actually no. I personally can't bear to watch the process myself.
> AEvasive of me, no? But I did think that Morse, Wilkins, et. al. might
> be interested. ;-)

Am sure your inability to bear to watch is just an effect of you being
capable of compassion.
And, that your compassion is due to well enough connected neurons (or neural
circuits) that can both
mirror and "memorize" misery.
(Here, the misery I am referring to is of course especially SHITS come
CURSES).

>
> Keep up the good work, Peter. I particularly liked your statement on
> another thread:
>
> I am afraid I cannot easily abide by expressed attitudes/statements that
> has the effect of hiding something important -- EVEN if what is being
hidden
> is hideous and hyper-demotivating to the declarator. ;-|
>
> If I were to become so tactful that I would take no action that
> might rattle or wreck any AEVASIVEly acquired personality across
> the Internet - then I would not dare to put across any EPT view and
> opinion at all.
>
> Yet I notice that your observations are so couched in private jargon
> that there is little risk that your typical subject will become hyper-
> demotivated. Translating your ideas into plain English is so difficult
> that most people have stopped attempting to do so. So, perhaps you
> are really being tactful after all. ;-)

I don't expect that you know just _how right_ your statement is!

Your hunch hits a nail thorough my protective (percEPTively and
concEPTually) thinking cap.

When compassion in combined with a percEPTively concEPTualizing, thinking
cap,
it creates an _in realtime ambiadvantageously
actention module energizing_ personality profile;
one that is no less ironic (perhaps in some sense *more* ironic) than any
other - EPTly defined as
more inEPTly AEVASIVE - personality profile.
;-)

Yours relatively respectfully,

P



.

Quantcast