Re: A Consortium of Scientists
- From: "Peter F" <notdisclosed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 14:11:35 -0400 (EDT)
"g" <gillawton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:da518a$1d0a$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
<snip>
> So long as we can keep the intellectual child alive in our minds and
hearts,
> there
> is hope.
> g
Am touched by your impassioned optimism.
And, I like how you write to define, promote, and defend this by you
envisioned opportunity for cognitive-intellectual consensus based on
scientific facts and principles.
Besides, I am pleased that you so far (or up till recently) have not
been completely put off by my _realistically vague_ worldview;
one that I have been inclined and perversely motivated to _already_ have
acquired.
That is, acquired but obviously not managed to smoothly communicate and
'flawlessly' formulate.
Even just a noticeably less flawed finish would be more than fine with me.
On the other hand, perfection is in this case forever beyond reach. As a
matter of principle, that is.
I leave it open for anyone to try to find a specific plug to pull that would
make it sink;
Or, for anyone to suggest or help me to make some specific improvement.
Even a single sentence-reconstruction-suggestion would be warmly welcomed.
;->
And, don't think that I am not (or am not aiming to be) open minded.
Because, to cognitively, and as rationally as my mostly not
mathematical mind allows me, face reality -
whatever the theoretical threats it (or people) throws at me - is my most
frequently indulged in addiction.
For a perception of a theoretical threat to be experienced "as such"
(i.e. not just as a dryly recognized discrepancy) it must
elicit a corresponding negative feeling or emotion [a firing of, and free
flow of efferents from,
Reticular Activating Type neurons that essentially energizes consciousnessT
[the T-tag flags that I mean the word in the simultaneously more precise and
general,
than conventionally meant, EPT sense] at or up to and including the
visceromotor and emotional
(hence non-cognitive) levels of Consciousness [alternative way to flag the
EPT-specific meaning of this word].
[BTW: I am willing to characterize my worldview as skeptical (even
somewhat cynical); And, as a penny-pinching philanthropically oriented
overview.;)]
Through *eclectic pragmatic theft* of the ideas of others, combined with
*error plagued trials* of by me freshly fabricated terms,
I searched for, partly generated, and eventually took, the opportunity to
reach philosophical orgasm (or, if not quite that much of an over the top
theoretical titillation,
at least more than an 'ontologically philosophical satisfaction';).
As it turned out, this reward for my efforts as if arrived in tandem with a
concEPT-enabled grasp [loose and tentative grasp, as of a slippery soap -
but a grasp all the same]
of some aspects of What Is going on.
---------
"Another BTW":
I have not yet, and perhaps never will, put all
my cards on the table in this forum.
If I would try I expect Josh to give it his wash (away)
treatment unless he himself was away camping and had
appointed a stand-in that stumbled.;>
--------
EPT, my eccentrically penned (turdgidly formulated) worldview,
is homeopathically jocular by way of conceptual ingredients whose role
have been to 'in_stink_tively' galvanize
primarily me, and so presumably (as punted on by me) also a small
percentage - or per mille - of other pundits,
against potentially off-putting (and analysis aborting) onerous insights.
%-}
The combination of scientific or at least seriously science-aligned
rationales, with means of "buffering by buffooning" (light-making techniques
in the service of
achieving enlightenment) is EPTly described as "fuzzsilly logical" (or
fuzzsilly logic).
My AEVASIVE motivation makes me inclined to try to polish and
promote my 'EPT manifesto' perpetually,
precisely because it depends on "primal passions".
That is, conditioned-in, mainly neural,
states that Janov calls primal pain, and
that I have re-conceptualized to CURSES.
[Or, more precisely, concEPTualized as, from (or with minimal acronymic size
associatively mapped from) CURSES,
to (or alternatively, with approximately maximally acronymic size mapped
from) identically pronounced CCKHHURSES.]
That I have done so, shows that EPT is an a schematically explanatory
personal terminology (or explanatory philosophical take) that as if
"extends"
Janov's snuggly science-aligned (neuropsychobiological) "Primal Theory"
(and his closely associated and intertwined therapeutic approach)
into an "evolutionary philosophy type" direction.
Also, EPT was also in a certain sense inspired (or "encouraged") by Primal
Theory/Therapy.
----------------------------
Any "AEVASIVE symptom", of any persons, is, broadly outlined, a symptom
of their (our) human lineage-specific phylogeny, lifetime conditioning
(and by "exterogenetically" - or epigenetically - transmitted conditioning
and imprinting affecting peoples parents and grandparents), and concurrent
motivation partly
by the motivating pressure exerted by the excitatory electrochemical output
of neurons conditioned to have a chronically heightened average frequency of
firing (pressures exerted by CURSES) - originally caused (or conditioned-in,
or as if "put" into,
the "Actention Selection System") by SHITS that I people have personally
been in.
CURSES can e.g. also manifest as "bottled-up" feelings of frustration-anger.
>>From the above you should be able to conclude that my brand of biting, and
buoyant babbling
philosophical product (or preoccupation), can almost literally work like a
buoy.
I.e., can work as a device by which to stay psychologically afloat - as in
not sinking into a depressed state..
[Not that my past project and current preoccupation with EPT has been or is
a particularly "bipolar" AEVASIVE symptom.]
Any one who adopts and understands and thinks about a people's AEVASIVE
styles (or ditto personality profiles) the way I do, would use
AEVASIVE and all other EPTly provided corrective/protective "conceptual
lenses" to see how we are and got and get to be this way.
And they could of course then also be thought to see things from a very
similar "weltenschaung angle" (or percEPTively optimized outlook).
And this not by standing on a TOE but simply to have roughly the same
"Foremost Overview Of Truth", that I do. %-]
P
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Consortium of Scientists
- From: g
- Re: A Consortium of Scientists
- References:
- A Consortium of Scientists
- From: g
- Re: A Consortium of Scientists
- From: Peter F
- Re: A Consortium of Scientists
- From: g
- A Consortium of Scientists
- Prev by Date: Re: Hamilton's Rule In The Mirror Evaded
- Next by Date: Re: Article: On the Great Chain of Being
- Previous by thread: Re: A Consortium of Scientists
- Next by thread: Re: A Consortium of Scientists
- Index(es):
Loading