Re: Underestimating 'r'
- From: an588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Catherine Woodgold)
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
"Perplexed in Peoria" (jimmenegay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
> I agree with Tim. Successful communication is more likely if
> both parties adhere to received conventions as to what their
> words and symbols mean.
If you provide me with any conventions I haven't yet
received, I'll probably be happy to try to follow those
conventions.
I'll still tend to assign symbols to concepts I define
that I haven't seen defined by others yet.
--
Cathy Woodgold
http://www.ncf.ca/~an588/par_home.html
We are all Iraqis now.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Underestimating 'r'
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Underestimating 'r'
- References:
- Underestimating 'r'
- From: Tim Tyler
- Underestimating 'r'
- Prev by Date: Re: Underestimating 'r'
- Next by Date: Re: Response to Orgel Article
- Previous by thread: Re: Underestimating 'r'
- Next by thread: Re: Underestimating 'r'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|