Re: Hamilton's Rule is Xeno's Paradox ( was Re: Underestimating 'r')
- From: EKurtz99@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:06:28 -0400 (EDT)
John Edser wrote:
In Xeno's Paradox the algebraic constant "time" has
> been deleted as an oversimplification. This reduces the mathematics to
> become entirely, just a relative proposition within which the hare can never
> actually catch up to the tortoise.
Of course it doesn't, you idiot. Zeno thought he had found a paradox
because he did not know how to compute the limit of a convergent sum.
Neither do you, of course. However, he has an excuse - he lived 2,500
years ago. What's yours?
(to compound the problem, you are confusing one of Aesop's fables - The
Hare and The Tortoise - with Aristotle's version of Zeno's paradox (or
one of them) - Achilles and the Tortoise)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Hamilton's Rule is Xeno's Paradox ( was Re: Underestimating 'r')
- From: John Edser
- Hamilton's Rule is Xeno's Paradox ( was Re: Underestimating 'r')
- Prev by Date: Re: Hamilton's rule
- Next by Date: Re: Article: On the Origins of Chemical Biodefense
- Previous by thread: Re: Hamilton's Rule is Xeno's Paradox ( was Re: Underestimating 'r')
- Next by thread: Re: Hamilton's Rule is Xeno's Paradox ( was Re: Underestimating 'r')
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading