Re: Article: On the Origins of Chemical Biodefense
- From: anon1@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:39:50 -0400 (EDT)
> What we need is a novel theory about structural convergence with a
> catchy title in order to upset the apple cart and bring the "trade
> secret" out into the open. How about "punctuated analogy?"
How about "pseudo-intelligent design"? :-)
(Your suspension-bridge metaphor triggered that idea.)
> Convergance can't be ruled out so it needs
> to be offered as an alternative explanation. It's wrong to conclude
> that two proteins are homologous just because they are similar in
> structure.
I agree. (Not that my opinion matters at all.)
..
.
- References:
- Article: On the Origins of Chemical Biodefense
- From: Robert Karl Stonjek
- Re: Article: On the Origins of Chemical Biodefense
- From: jimmenegay
- Re: Article: On the Origins of Chemical Biodefense
- From: Larry Moran
- Article: On the Origins of Chemical Biodefense
- Prev by Date: Re: Hamilton's rule
- Next by Date: Re: Underestimating 'r'
- Previous by thread: Re: Article: On the Origins of Chemical Biodefense
- Next by thread: PIP you may like this study
- Index(es):