Re: Vent Life? Not the O2 dependent part
- From: an588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Catherine Woodgold)
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:29:35 -0500 (EST)
(TomHendricks474@xxxxxx) writes:
> I'm a sunlight chauvinist too.
> Those who favor the vent origin scenario must do so
> without the O2 dependency.
Well, there are some organisms that don't use
O2, aren't there? What about anaerobic bacteria?
--
Cathy Woodgold
http://www.ncf.ca/~an588/par_home.html
We are all Iraqis now.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vent Life? Not the O2 dependent part
- From: Anthony Cerrato
- Re: Vent Life? Not the O2 dependent part
- Prev by Date: Re: Evolution and Love
- Next by Date: Re: Hamilton's Rule invalid
- Previous by thread: Re: GC content for heat protection or coding?
- Next by thread: Re: Vent Life? Not the O2 dependent part
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading