evolutionary success of humans
- From: pauldepstein@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:35:55 -0500 (EST)
I understand that there are approximately 6 billion humans. How does
this compare with the total number of living mammals? Is there any
other mammalian species as numerous?
I am a little bit puzzled by our evolutionary success because we have
an enormous number of relative disadvantages compared to other mammals.
Here are just a few of them.
1) Long gestation period.
2) Almost no multiple births.
3) Bad hearing.
4) Poor mobility -- slow on land, and terrible at swimming and
climbing.
5) Terrible sense of smell.
Paul Epstein
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- From: whitesickle@xxxxxxx
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- From: whitesickle@xxxxxxx
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- From: Ron O
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- From: JoeSP
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- From: Ron O
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- From: Kadee
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- Prev by Date: Re: Life is more stable than inorganic chemicals
- Next by Date: Re: Chemicals Do Not Benefit
- Previous by thread: Re: The uncorrected simplifications/oversimplifications of
- Next by thread: Re: evolutionary success of humans
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|