Re: evolutionary success of humans
- From: "Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmenegay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:55:26 -0500 (EST)
"John Wilkins" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dmgj6k$2dgq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Skeletal evidence suggests that agrarian societies tend to grow shorter,
> live shorter, and have more diet-related illnesses. On the other hand,
> the energy budget for these societies is much higher than HG societies,
> and so the population density is much higher. ...
> Farmers work 16 hours days in
> backbreaking labour, and tend to be socially isolated.
The high population densities of early agricultural societies tends
to contradict the conventional wisdom that farmers are socially
isolated.
I suspect that urban Americans and Australians tend to have a somewhat
distainful opinion regarding the social opportunities available to
farmers due to the fact that agriculture in those societies tends
to be low density and has a pioneering history.
I suspect that most of the world's agriculturalists have always had
sufficient opportunity for the core social activities of exchanging
gossip, folklore, and news with neighbors, and some limited contact
with a metropolitan urban population. Most agriculture in primitive
times involved garden plots of just a few acres and was conducted by
villages rather than by isolated plainsmen.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: evolutionary success of humans
- Prev by Date: Re: HELP: HOW TO DOWNLOAD THE TOTAL PROTEIN SEQUENCE DATABASE OF MOUSE FROM NCBI
- Next by Date: Re: Behavioral Genetics: A pseudo science or real scientific discipline
- Previous by thread: Re: evolutionary success of humans
- Next by thread: Re: evolutionary success of humans
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|