Re: Group selected altruism - (was: Hamilton's rule)



"Jim McGinn" jimmcginn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote
> Like I said, when it comes to science you're
> one hell of a good jazz musician.

Jim,
This type of rhetorical nonsense is just a waste of time. Two entirely valid
hypothesis were offered by Hoelzer and Edser as simple statements in the
English language. However, they contradicted each other so only one of them
can be true. Therefore what remains to be done is testing at least one of
them to refutation. The only way any hypothesis can be offered to another
person's mind is as a statement in a language that they understand unless
your argument is that we are supposed to be able to read minds.

Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

edser@xxxxxxxxxx





.