Re: The Cyclical Part
- From: "Tom Hendricks" <tomhendricks474@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:53:14 -0500 (EST)
> > Yes. But at least Tom is right to be fixated on solar
> activity, in that
> > without the universal process of sun and solar system
> formation the
> > buildiing blocks
> > of the first of the to us ancestral self-replicable types
> of molecules
> > would not have
> > seen 'the light of day'. :-)
> >
> > P
>
> LOL. Yes, but could we not also say that, on planets with
> deep sea thermal vents, alien chemical volcanic slushes, or
> strong
> electromagnetic or sub-crustal tidal frictional heating,
> such building-block molecules might possibly be formed which
> do see the light of the stars? :)
> ...tonyC
Well as De Duve says, "There is... ample evidence that a number
of biogenic compounds can form spntaneously under primitive
Earth conditions, in interstellar space, and on comets and
meteorites." BUT
that ain't life - and in due time I think you'll see that you need
1. water
2. wet dry cycle (not all water all the time)
3.. UV from the sun.
It's the sun that makes the planet, supplies the chemicals
forces them to change, and adapt to the heat cycle or be destroyed.
PS Ventists are all wet!
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Cyclical Part
- From: Anthony Cerrato
- Re: The Cyclical Part
- References:
- [OOL] The Cyclical Part
- From: TomHendricks474
- [OOL] The Cyclical Part
- Prev by Date: Re: More than Medicine?
- Next by Date: Re: Name the earliest living thing
- Previous by thread: Re: [OOL] The Cyclical Part
- Next by thread: Re: The Cyclical Part
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
