Re: The evolution of belief
- From: "Peter F" <fell_spamtrap_in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:36:31 -0500 (EST)
"Anthony Campbell" <ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dsanvi$2h5p$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2006-02-06, Mark Thomas <m.thomas57@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:group
By way of comparison, to help me understand the terms you use, would
language, which has parallels with religion, require duo-centric
itsselection or mono-centric Darwinian organism mutualism to explain
interesting.evolution?
The parallels between religion and language are indeed very
In "The Symbolic Species", Terrence Deacon proposes that languagesargument
evolve to be easily learned by children. I think that the same
can be applied to the evolution of religion. For more on this, seethough
http://www.acampbell.org.uk/essays/skeptic/language.html.
Deacon regards languages as being in a sense parasitic on humans,
perhaps symbiont would be more appropriate. There is an interesting
question whether religions should be considered parasitic or symbiont.
No such considerations are worthwhile if poignant insights
is what one is after, as I see it.
Language is far better seen as an adaptation for
evolutionary opportunities AND against evolutionary
adversities (amongst which the "conditioned-in" endogenous
pressure of CURSES type memories should not be ignored).
Language is a means of self and social regulation.
It can reinforce as well as repress focuses of actention.
That languages is functionally so tightly linked up with
the "endorphin system" that it makes "ideas as opiates"
a totally approapriate and relevant expression.
The capabilities of hypnotists (and their subjects) is only the tip
of the iceberg.
P
.
- References:
- Re: The evolution of belief
- From: John Edser
- Re: The evolution of belief
- From: Mark Thomas
- Re: The evolution of belief
- From: Anthony Campbell
- Re: The evolution of belief
- Prev by Date: Cope's rule and bacterial evolution
- Next by Date: Re: He'll be Weighing Brains Next
- Previous by thread: Re: The evolution of belief
- Next by thread: Re: The evolution of belief
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|