Re: "Algorithms" in Molecular Biology?
- From: "kramer" <kodream@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 23:36:21 -0400 (EDT)
The oldest con trick in the book is to expand what you say a chair is via a
continuous ad hoc redefinition so that the meaning that is supposed to be
provided now includes its own refutation, continuously evading any test to
refutation. Here intellectual anarchy replaces the evolution of theories via
their refutation allowing group orientated intellectual thuggery to replace
individual based learning and inquiry. When this happens within a tribal
based species like our own within which selection has favored tribal
conformity over non conformity and the creation of a warrior class of mostly
hyped up younger males to protect the tribe as a whole and enforce (at the
direction of mostly older males) tribal mores, then what we call
"civilization" is just dumped resulting in mass violence. The larger the
group the more the devastating the violence will be to all because it will
destroy critical interdependency within that group.
Actually, mud slinging and bally ranting are much older. The algorithm
for refuting my point is to provide a definition of Algorithm which all
agree upon. Mind you I do have some expertise in the area of
algorithms. Maybe you will understand it a little clearer if I explain
it like this.
What came first the search for the definition of an algorithm or
search. Is searching not an answer in and of itself. Searching is an
algorithm maybe searching and algorithms are synonymous.
What do you think?
.
- References:
- Re: "Algorithms" in Molecular Biology?
- From: John Edser
- Re: "Algorithms" in Molecular Biology?
- Prev by Date: Re: Article: Forcing Darwin's hand: capturing natural selection in
- Next by Date: Re: "Algorithms" in Molecular Biology?
- Previous by thread: Re: "Algorithms" in Molecular Biology?
- Next by thread: Re: "Algorithms" in Molecular Biology?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|