Re: Bombshell?
- From: "Claudius Denk" <cladiusdenk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:02:09 -0400 (EDT)
"Joe Felsenstein" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Without attempting to speak to which of the various levels of selection is
most
important, or which mechanisms most active, it is worth noting that
Hamilton's
formula works of all of them.
Uh . . .
Crow and Aoki (PNAS 1982, 1984) showed that you
can derive from it conditions for group selection to favor an allele,
Anybody could "derive" such using the skyhook logic of the current paradigm.
and
it has long been known that reciprocal altruism fits into the same
equations
as well. So there is going to be no revolution in the algebra from this.
The issues don't involve algebra. They involve common sense.
The current paradigm is pretend science.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bombshell?
- From: Joe Felsenstein
- Re: Bombshell?
- References:
- Re: Bombshell?
- From: Guy Hoelzer
- Re: Bombshell?
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Bombshell?
- From: Anon.
- Re: Bombshell?
- From: Joe Felsenstein
- Re: Bombshell?
- Prev by Date: Re: Haldane's Dilemma and quantitative genetics
- Next by Date: Re: Diet and Evolution
- Previous by thread: Re: Bombshell?
- Next by thread: Re: Bombshell?
- Index(es):