Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon
- From: "johnwl4@xxxxxxx" <johnwl4@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:19:07 -0400 (EDT)
Spanish Paranoia wrote:
In order to make a proper use of statistical data to predict past orOkay, here is another URL which deals with the Cro-Magnon data:
future events you must have enough trustable samples, which is just not
the case when dealing with Neanderthal fossils.
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Paleoanthr o/files/Papers/
PDF/Molecular% 20Views%20of% 20Human%20Origin s.pdf
Does support no interbreeding. And neither Gisele nor Philip
Dieteker seem to think much of the article which found traces of
ancient human genes originating in Asia.
I haven't much of any opinion, though, even yet, except the
weight seems to be against interbreeding. I could cite historical
incidents either way, eskimos and indians, as in _Company of
Adventurers_, say. Also, HN didn't use rock from a distance for
tools, but AMH did - which implies ancient HS could have formed large
war parties to wipe out isolated HN groups. But what do I know?
Except people have held opinions before that proved wrong.
Regards
John GW
.
- References:
- Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon
- From: Spanish Paranoia
- Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon
- Prev by Date: Population genetics question regarding sexual selection
- Next by Date: Re: Link between evolution and "Wisdom of Crowds" ideas?
- Previous by thread: Re: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon
- Next by thread: Neanderthal vs Cro-Magnon
- Index(es):