Re: A probe of your preparedness (ability and/or willingness) to



"Entertained by my own EIMC" licenced.to.be.AEVASIVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:-
Here is two other small steps for you to consider, to take or refuse.

Some flight-or-fight situations are *not* of a dramatic character, and
are
only very gradually causing the kind of neurochemical signaling that
most
directly corresponds to somatic (including inflammatory) and/or
psychological distress (including fear, pain, suffering, anxiety...).

Some of these situations are, likewise, not physically escapable, so
they
too would lead to a self-defeating (hence "negatively naturally
selected"
and "fatally futile") fleeing or fighting - or ditto distress if a
state
of
"freeze" could and would then not be entered into.

JE:-
Please provide an example from within the biological sciences.

Situations that cause (most especially in the case of human immatures or
babies)what John Bowlby called "skin-hunger".

Although Bolwby studied *very seldom touched* institutionalized
infants/children this 'effect (-profile typical) of this particular
example
of SHITS come CURSES" (or a kind of a predicament that causes CURSES-type
imprints) it is not exclusively occur in the lives of institutionalized
children.

Also note that this is but one subcategory of situations exemplifying
predicaments of a
Potentially Overwhelmingly Onerous character.

Yours sincerely (only decEPTively joking),
Peter

JE:-
I remain unsure as to what exactly you are suggesting. Are you arguing that
Bolwby's love deprived and non parental imprinted children enter into a
state of emotional "freeze" because no other option for them exists?

Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

edser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


.